Conventional writing methods are flawed right from the start
The conventional academic research workflow suggests that you first pick a topic to work on, do the necessary research, think about creative solutions, and consolidate your findings in writing.
There are drawbacks to this method:
- Choosing a topic purely from your temporary memory is very unreliable because the feature positive effect gives undue importance to recent information
- Picking a topic is hard to do without reading and understanding
- It is demotivating to realize during the research phase that the topic choice was incorrect or uninteresting
- You are faced with a blank screen when you start writing which makes getting started difficult
# References
Good workflow design The importance of writing for learning, understanding, thinking and retention